How accurate are quotations and references in medical journals?
- 28 September 1985
- Vol. 291 (6499) , 884-886
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.291.6499.884
Abstract
The accuracy of quotations and references in six medical journals published during January 1984 was assessed. The original author was misquoted in 15% of all references, and most of the errors would have misled readers. Errors in citation of references occurred in 24%, of which 8% were major errors--that is, they prevented immediate identification of the source of the reference. Inaccurate quotations and citations are displeasing for the original author, misleading for the reader, and mean that untruths become "accepted fact." Some suggestions for reducing these high levels of inaccuracy are that papers scheduled for publication with errors of citation should be returned to the author and checked completely and a permanent column specifically for misquotations could be inserted into the journal.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Pain Control After Spinal Fusion with Harrington RodsPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1985
- Two cheers for the computer?BMJ, 1985
- CARDIOMYTHOLOGYThe Lancet, 1984
- Techniques of Online Citation Verification in NLM DatabasesMedical Reference Services Quarterly, 1983
- Should Letters Be Reviewed?New England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- How Reliable Are Letters?New England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- An investigation of the validity of bibliographic citationsJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1983
- Reference accuracy in articles accepted for publication in the Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.1977
- Thoughts About Medical Writing XXXVII. Verify Your ReferencesAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1976