The value of calcium nitrate and urea for sugar beet, and the effect of late nitrogenous top dressings
- 1 June 1960
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Agricultural Science
- Vol. 54 (3) , 395-398
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021859600021341
Abstract
1. Twenty-eight experiments on sugar beet in 1956–8 compared ammonium sulphate, calcium nitrate and urea applied to the seedbed before sowing. The three fertilizers were compared at rates which supplied nil, 0·6 and 1·2 cwt. N/acre. Treatments in which 0·6 cwt. N/acre was held back until the end of June were also included. 2. Average responses in sugar yield were low, 0·6 cwt. N/acre provided virtually all the nitrogen required for maximum sugar production. The heavier nitrogen dressing, on the other hand, substantially increased the yield of tops. 3. Calcium nitrate and urea were as effective as ammonium sulphate at raising sugar yield. There was no damage to germination with any fertilizer, and when urea containing 4·5% biuret was used for topdressing in 1956, no damage was seen. Calcium nitrate and, to a lesser extent, urea produced more tops than ammonium sulphate. 4. Putting all the nitrogen into the seedbed was as effective as a split dressing in raising sugar yield. Leaching of nitrogen in a wet summer is therefore not important to sugar beet. Late nitrogen, on the other hand, never harmed sugar production if some had been given to the seedbed.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparisons between combine-drilling and broadcasting muriate of potash for spring barleyThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1959
- GERMINATION OF WHEAT AS AFFECTED BY BIURET CONTAMINATION IN UREASoil Science, 1957
- The fertilizer requirements of sugar beetThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1956
- Factors affecting the loss of yield of sugar beet caused by beet yellows virus. II. Nutrition and varietyThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1947
- A chemical study of sugar beet during the first growth yearThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1934