Assessing Human Health Response in Life Cycle Assessment Using ED10s and DALYs: Part 2—Noncancer Effects
- 1 October 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Risk Analysis
- Vol. 22 (5) , 947-963
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00263
Abstract
In Part 1 of this article we developed an approach for the calculation of cancer effect measures for life cycle assessment (LCA). In this article, we propose and evaluate the method for the screening of noncancer toxicological health effects. This approach draws on the noncancer health risk assessment concept of benchmark dose, while noting important differences with regulatory applications in the objectives of an LCA study. We adopt the central tendency estimate of the toxicological effect dose inducing a 10% response over background, ED10, to provide a consistent point of departure for default linear low‐dose response estimates (βED10). This explicit estimation of low‐dose risks, while necessary in LCA, is in marked contrast to many traditional procedures for noncancer assessments. For pragmatic reasons, mechanistic thresholds and nonlinear low‐dose response curves were not implemented in the presented framework. In essence, for the comparative needs of LCA, we propose that one initially screens alternative activities or products on the degree to which the associated chemical emissions erode their margins of exposure, which may or may not be manifested as increases in disease incidence. We illustrate the method here by deriving the βED10) slope factors from bioassay data for 12 chemicals and outline some of the possibilities for extrapolation from other more readily available measures, such as the no observable adverse effect levels (NOAEL), avoiding uncertainty factors that lead to inconsistent degrees of conservatism from chemical to chemical. These extrapolations facilitated the initial calculation of slope factors for an additional 403 compounds; ranging from 10−6 to 103 (risk per mg/kg‐day dose). The potential consequences of the effects are taken into account in a preliminary approach by combining the βED10) with the severity measure disability adjusted life years (DALY), providing a screening‐level estimate of the potential consequences associated with exposures, integrated over time and space, to a given mass of chemical released into the environment for use in LCA.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Harmonization: Developing Consistent Guidelines for Applying Mode of Action and Dosimetry Information to Cancer and Noncancer Risk AssessmentHuman and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 1998
- Noncancer Risk Assessment: A Probabilistic Alternative to Current PracticeHuman and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 1996
- Subchronic to chronic exposure extrapolation: Toxicologic evidence for a reduced uncertainty factorHuman and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 1995
- Dose-Response Assessment for Developmental Toxicity II. Comparison of Generic Benchmark Dose Estimates with No Observed Adverse Effect LevelsFundamental and Applied Toxicology, 1994
- Dose-Response Assessment for Developmental Toxicity III. Statistical ModelsFundamental and Applied Toxicology, 1994
- On Reference Dose (RFD) and Its Underlying Toxicity Data BaseToxicology and Industrial Health, 1992
- ES&T Series: Cancer Risk Assessment. 3. Cancer dose-response extrapolationsEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1987
- Dose-response relationships for carcinogens: a review.Environmental Health Perspectives, 1987
- Development of an Acceptable Factor To Estimate Chronic End Points From Acute Toxicity DataToxicology and Industrial Health, 1985