A Prospective Study of Common Bile Duct Calculi in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 239 (1) , 28-33
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000103069.00170.9c
Abstract
To define the incidence of problematic common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In patients selected for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the true incidence of potentially problematic common bile duct calculi and their natural history has not been determined. We evaluated the incidence and early natural history of common bile duct calculi in all patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative and delayed postoperative cholangiography. Operative cholangiography was attempted in all patients. In those patients in whom a filling defect was noted in the bile duct, the fine bore cholangiogram catheter was left securely clipped in the cystic duct for repeated cholangiography at 48 hours and at approximately 6 weeks postoperatively. Operative cholangiography was attempted in 997 consecutive patients and was accomplished in 962 patients (96%). Forty-six patients (4.6%) had at least one filling defect. Twelve of these had a normal cholangiogram at 48 hours (26% possible false-positive operative cholangiogram) and a further 12 at 6 weeks (26% spontaneous passage of calculi). Spontaneous passage was not determined by either the number or size of calculi or by the diameter of the bile duct. Only 22 patients (2.2% of total population) had persistent common bile duct calculi at 6 weeks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and retrieved by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Choledocholithiasis occurs in 3.4% of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy but more than one third of these pass the calculi spontaneously within 6 weeks of operation and may be spared endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Treatment decisions based on assessment by operative cholangiography alone would result in unnecessary interventions in 50% of patients who had either false positive studies or subsequently passed the calculi. These data support a short-term expectant approach in the management of clinically silent choledocholithiasis in patients selected for LC.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Routine vs ``on demand'' postoperative ERCP for small bile duct calculi detected at intraoperative cholangiographySurgical Endoscopy, 2000
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography and Ultrasound Compared with Direct Cholangiography in the Detection of CholedocholithiasisClinical Radiology, 2000
- Must ERCP Be Routinely Performed if Choledocholithiasis Is Suspected?Digestive Surgery, 1999
- Timing of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopanereatography and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Treatment of CholedocholithiasisJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 1999
- ERCP in association with laparoscopic cholecystectomySurgical Endoscopy, 1996
- Yield of prospective, noninvasive evaluation of the common bile duct combined with selective ERCP/sphincterotomy in 1390 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomy patientsGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1995
- Management of bile duct stones in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1994
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: The European experienceThe American Journal of Surgery, 1993
- Ultrasound detection of choledocholithiasis: Prospective comparison with ERCP in the postcholecystectomy patientGastrointestinal Radiology, 1986
- Cost-effectiveness of operative cholangiographyThe American Journal of Surgery, 1979