Patient‐based outcomes of cervical dystonia: A review of rating scales
- 30 August 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Movement Disorders
- Vol. 19 (9) , 1054-1059
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.20055
Abstract
Decisions on treatment choice for patients are based on trials and outcome studies that are wholly dependent upon the scientific quality of the rating scales used. This study reviewed rating scales used in cervical dystonia outcome research to determine the extent that they satisfy recommended criteria for rigorous measurement. © 2004 Movement Disorder SocietyKeywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring disease impact in disabling neurological conditions: are patientsʼ perspectives and scientific rigor compatible?Current Opinion in Neurology, 2002
- The Symptom Checklist-90 Revised Questionnaire: No Psychological Profiles in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome–DystoniaJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1999
- Treatment of cervical dystonia: A comparison of measures for outcome assessmentMovement Disorders, 1998
- Measuring Patient Benefit From Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of DystoniaPharmacoEconomics, 1997
- BotB (botulinum Toxin type B): Evaluation of safety and tolerability in botulinum toxin type A‐Resistant cervical dystonia patients (preliminary study)Movement Disorders, 1997
- Quantitative assessment of botulinum toxin treatment in 43 patients with head tremorMovement Disorders, 1997
- Pain in spasmodic torticollisPain, 1997
- Evaluating neurological outcome measures: the bare essentials.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1996
- Personality in torticollis: a controlled studyPsychological Medicine, 1988
- DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY OF BOTULINUM TOXIN IN SPASMODIC TORTICOLLISThe Lancet, 1986