Subdominant CD8 T-Cell Epitopes Account for Protection against Cytomegalovirus Independent of Immunodomination
- 15 June 2008
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Virology
- Vol. 82 (12) , 5781-5796
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00155-08
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection continues to be a complication in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Preexisting donor immunity is recognized as a favorable prognostic factor for the reconstitution of protective antiviral immunity mediated primarily by CD8 T cells. Furthermore, adoptive transfer of CMV-specific memory CD8 T (CD8-T(M)) cells is a therapeutic option for preventing CMV disease in HSCT recipients. Given the different CMV infection histories of donor and recipient, a problem may arise from an antigenic mismatch between the CMV variant that has primed donor immunity and the CMV variant acquired by the recipient. Here, we have used the BALB/c mouse model of CMV infection in the immunocompromised host to evaluate the importance of donor-recipient CMV matching in immundominant epitopes (IDEs). For this, we generated the murine CMV (mCMV) recombinant virus mCMV-DeltaIDE, in which the two memory repertoire IDEs, the IE1-derived peptide 168-YPHFMPTNL-176 presented by the major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) molecule L(d) and the m164-derived peptide 257-AGPPRYSRI-265 presented by the MHC-I molecule D(d), are both functionally deleted. Upon adoptive transfer, polyclonal donor CD8-T(M) cells primed by mCMV-DeltaIDE and the corresponding revertant virus mCMV-revDeltaIDE controlled infection of immunocompromised recipients with comparable efficacy and regardless of whether or not IDEs were presented in the recipients. Importantly, CD8-T(M) cells primed under conditions of immunodomination by IDEs protected recipients in which IDEs were absent. This shows that protection does not depend on compensatory expansion of non-IDE-specific CD8-T(M) cells liberated from immunodomination by the deletion of IDEs. We conclude that protection is, rather, based on the collective antiviral potential of non-IDEs independent of the presence or absence of IDE-mediated immunodomination.Keywords
This publication has 83 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epitope-specific in vivo protection against cytomegalovirus disease by CD8 T cells in the murine model of preemptive immunotherapyMedical Microbiology and Immunology, 2008
- DNA Immunization Using Highly Conserved Murine Cytomegalovirus Genes Encoding Homologs of Human Cytomegalovirus UL54 (DNA Polymerase) and UL105 (Helicase) Elicits Strong CD8 T-Cell Responses and Is Protective against Systemic ChallengeJournal of Virology, 2007
- CD8 T Cells Control Cytomegalovirus Latency by Epitope-Specific Sensing of Transcriptional ReactivationJournal of Virology, 2006
- Confronting Complexity: Real-World Immunodominance in Antiviral CD8+ T Cell ResponsesImmunity, 2006
- Cytomegalovirus Encodes a Positive Regulator of Antigen PresentationJournal of Virology, 2006
- Broadly targeted human cytomegalovirus-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells dominate the memory compartments of exposed subjectsThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 2005
- Clinical aspects of cmv infection after stem cell transplantationHuman Immunology, 2004
- Relative Importance of Cytomegalovirus Load as a Risk Factor for Cytomegalovirus Disease in the Immunocompromised HostPublished by S. Karger AG ,1997
- Restoration of Viral Immunity in Immunodeficient Humans by the Adoptive Transfer of T Cell ClonesScience, 1992
- Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reactionGene, 1989