Current prevalence and incidence of infectious disease markers and estimated window‐period risk in the American Red Cross blood donor population
Top Cited Papers
- 28 August 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Transfusion
- Vol. 42 (8) , 975-979
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00174.x
Abstract
BACKGROUND : There has been continuing prog‐ ress in measures to reduce the risk of transfusion‐ transmitted infection, including introduction of serologic tests of increased sensitivity and the recent implementation of investigational NAT in small pools of samples. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS : Data relating to all blood donations to the American Red Cross have been consolidated into a single database. The prevalence of confirmed‐positive test results for HBsAg, HCV, HIV, and HTLV were evaluated for each year for first‐time donors from 1995 through 2001. Incidence rates for these infections were evaluated among repeat donors having at least two donations in a 2‐year period. The frequencies of HIV‐1 RNA‐ and HCV RNA‐positive, seronegative donations were assessed for first‐time and repeat donations. The relationship risk = (window period) × (incidence) was used to assess residual risk among repeat donations and to evaluate the incidence of HCV and HIV infection among first‐time donors. RESULTS : During the study period, prevalence rates for all markers declined significantly over time: in 2001, the rates per 100,000 were 75.6 for HBsAg, 299 for HCV, 9.7 for HIV, and 9.6 for HTLV; the corresponding incidence rates (/100,000 person‐years) were 1.267, 1.889, 1.554, and 0.239, respectively. Estimates of residual risk in donations from repeat donors (after NAT) for HCV and HIV were 1 per 1,935,000 and 1 per 2,135,000, respectively. However, incidence rates for these agents are approximately two times greater among first‐time donors. For both HCV and HIV, NAT yield was concordant with that predicted by current window‐period models. CONCLUSION : These data cover about half of all the whole blood collected in the United States. They suggest increasing improvement in transfusion safety and clearly define the benefit of pooled NAT.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Germs, Gels and Genomes. A Personal Recollection of 30 Years in Blood Safety TestingPublished by Springer Nature ,2002
- NAT of the United States and Canadian blood supplyTransfusion, 2000
- Failure of Routine HIV-1 Tests in a Case Involving Transmission With Preseroconversion Blood Components During the Infectious Window PeriodJAMA, 2000
- Trends in Incidence and Prevalence of Major Transfusion-Transmissible Viral Infections in US Blood Donors, 1991 to 1996Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,2000
- Hepatitis C virus transmission by a blood donation negative in nucleic acid amplification tests for viral RNAThe Lancet, 2000
- New Testing Strategy to Detect Early HIV-1 Infection for Use in Incidence Estimates and for Clinical and Prevention PurposesJAMA, 1998
- Demographic characteristics, unreported risk behaviors, and the prevalence and incidence of viral infections: a comparison of apheresis and whole‐blood donors. The Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor StudyTransfusion, 1998
- Safety of the Blood Supply in the United States: Opportunities and ControversiesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- A method for estimating hepatitis B virus incidence rates in volunteer blood donors. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor StudyTransfusion, 1997
- The Risk of Transfusion-Transmitted Viral InfectionsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996