Analysis of atypical urine cytology in a tertiary care center
Open Access
- 3 August 2005
- Vol. 105 (6) , 468-475
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21317
Abstract
BACKGROUND Voided urine cytology continues to play a paramount role in the surveillance of transitional cell neoplasms and as a screening modality in certain high-risk situations. Although a significant number of samples are diagnosed as atypical, there is little known about the outcome of these patients. In addition, the significance of transitional cell fragments in voided urine samples is uncertain. The objective of the current study was to evaluate retrospectively a large series of voided urine specimens that were reported as atypical. Standard cytomorphologic parameters were used with the aim of refining the atypical category. METHODS The authors studied 201 consecutive voided urine samples from 1995 that were evaluated by liquid-based cytology for the following features: specimen cellularity, the presence and number of cell clusters, and the architecture of the cell fragments. In addition, cells were examined for the following cytologic features: high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratios, nuclear membrane irregularities, hyperchromasia, India-ink nuclei, and chromatin pattern. Cytoplasmic features were evaluated but were limited significantly by poor preservation. Only specimens with a biopsy or cystoscopy and/or from patients who were followed for > 5 years were analyzed further. RESULTS In total, 23.4% of specimens showed transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) on biopsy, including 20 Grade 1 TCCs and 21 Grade 2 TCCs. Specimen cellularity, cluster numbers, nuclear membrane abnormalities, hyperchromasia, and India-ink nuclei were associated significantly with TCC. Twenty-six specimens (18.9%) were associated with renal calculi. CONCLUSIONS The atypical category contained a significant proportion of low-grade TCCs. Transitional cell clusters in voided urine are relevant clinically. The clinical picture, including the previous history of TCC and the presence of urinary calculi, provides valuable information when evaluating voided urine cytology. These features and careful attention to India-ink nuclei and nuclear membrane abnormalities could help make the “atypical” category a more meaningful group. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost efficiency analysis of modern cytocentrifugation methods versus liquid based (Cytyc Thinprep®) processing of urinary samplesJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2004
- Use of ThinPrep® monolayer technique and cytospin preparation in urine cytology: A comparative analysisDiagnostic Cytopathology, 2003
- The 2001 Bethesda SystemTerminology for Reporting Results of Cervical CytologyJAMA, 2002
- A COMPARISON OF CYTOLOGY AND FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION FOR THE DETECTION OF UROTHELIAL CARCINOMAJournal of Urology, 2000
- Subclassifying atypical urinary cytology specimensCancer, 2000
- Ancillary methods for the detection of recurrent urothelial neoplasiaCancer, 2000
- URINE CYTOLOGY: Is it Still the Gold Standard for Screening?Urologic Clinics of North America, 2000
- Cytology of Grade 1 Papillary Transitional Cell CarcinomaActa Cytologica, 1996
- Low grade transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Cytologic Diagnosis by Key Features as Identified by Logistic Regression AnalysisCancer, 1994
- Urinary cytology and bladder cancer. The cellular features of transitional cell neoplasmsCancer, 1984