The 2001 Bethesda SystemTerminology for Reporting Results of Cervical Cytology
Top Cited Papers
- 24 April 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 287 (16) , 2114-2119
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.16.2114
Abstract
ObjectivesThe Bethesda 2001 Workshop was convened to evaluate and update the 1991 Bethesda System terminology for reporting the results of cervical cytology. A primary objective was to develop a new approach to broaden participation in the consensus process.ParticipantsForum groups composed of 6 to 10 individuals were responsible for developing recommendations for discussion at the workshop. Each forum group included at least 1 cytopathologist, cytotechnologist, clinician, and international representative to ensure a broad range of views and interests. More than 400 cytopathologists, cytotechnologists, histopathologists, family practitioners, gynecologists, public health physicians, epidemiologists, patient advocates, and attorneys participated in the workshop, which was convened by the National Cancer Institute and cosponsored by 44 professional societies. More than 20 countries were represented.EvidenceLiterature review, expert opinion, and input from an Internet bulletin board were all considered in developing recommendations. The strength of evidence of the scientific data was considered of paramount importance.Consensus ProcessBethesda 2001 was a year-long iterative review process. An Internet bulletin board was used for discussion of issues and drafts of recommendations. More than 1000 comments were posted to the bulletin board over the course of 6 months. The Bethesda Workshop, held April 30-May 2, 2001, was open to the public. Postworkshop recommendations were posted on the bulletin board for a last round of critical review prior to finalizing the terminology.ConclusionsBethesda 2001 was developed with broad participation in the consensus process. The 2001 Bethesda System terminology reflects important advances in biological understanding of cervical neoplasia and cervical screening technology.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- 2001 Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Women With Cervical Cytological AbnormalitiesJAMA, 2002
- Management of women with atypical Papanicolaou tests of undetermined significance by board-certified gynecologists: Discrepancies with published guidelinesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2001
- Significance of “Normal” Endometrial Cells in Cervical Cytology from Asymptomatic Postmenopausal Women Receiving Hormone Replacement TherapyGynecologic Oncology, 2001
- Comparison of Three Management Strategies for Patients With Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance: Baseline Results From a Randomized TrialJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2001
- Papillomaviruses Causing Cancer: Evasion From Host-Cell Control in Early Events in CarcinogenesisJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Atypical epithelial cells and specimen adequacy: current laboratory practices of participants in the college of American pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in cervicovaginal cytology.Published by Wiley ,2000
- Natural History of Cervicovaginal Papillomavirus Infection in Young WomenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Biopsy findings in five hundred thirty-one patients with atypical glandular cells of uncertain significance as defined by the Bethesda systemAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
- Human Papillomavirus Messenger RNA Expression in Adenocarcinoma In Situ of the Uterine CervixInternational Journal of Gynecological Pathology, 1989