Policy and practice reviews
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
- Vol. 37 (2) , 199-213
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09640569408711970
Abstract
While there has been considerable change in the economy and environment of the UK countryside in the post‐war period, the basic divisions of responsibility of government agencies still reflect the framework established in the 1940s. However, the functions of these agencies have changed and expanded to embrace new environmental responsibilities. This ‘agency overspill’ leaves the definition of responsibilities of countryside agencies unclear and raises the issue of competition between them. It is argued that competition need not be counterproductive where agencies fill distinctive roles and where there is some degree of co‐ordination.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bargaining with Nature: The Discourse and Practice of 'Environmental Planning Gain'Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1993
- Private rights and public responsibilities: the prospects for agricultural and environmental controlsJournal of Rural Studies, 1988
- The great divide: an historical perspectiveLandscape Research, 1988
- POST‐MEDIEVAL AND RECENT CHANGES IN BRITISH VEGETATION: THE CULMINATION OF HUMAN INFLUENCENew Phytologist, 1984
- RURAL RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT IN BRITAIN AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNJournal of Agricultural Economics, 1976