The HMO Backlash — Righteous or Reactionary?
- 21 November 1996
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 335 (21) , 1601-1604
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199611213352112
Abstract
The membership of health maintenance organizations (HMOs) now exceeds 50 million people and may grow by an additional 50 million by the year 2000. But all is not well in HMO-land. An angry and determined backlash is spreading across the nation. In 1996 alone, 1000 pieces of legislation attempting to regulate or weaken HMOs were introduced in state legislatures, and 56 laws were passed in 35 states. The backlash movement brings together patients who complain of services denied and physicians who are suffering the loss of autonomy and income.1 There are several manifestations of the backlash: federal and state legislation, . . .Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The New Health Care GameNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Can medical savings accounts for the nonelderly reduce health care costs?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1996
- Extreme Risk — The New Corporate Proposition for PhysiciansNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- I. Special Report: Medical Savings Accounts: Design And Policy IssuesHealth Affairs, 1995
- Managed care plan performance since 1980. A literature analysisPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- Gatekeeping Revisited — Protecting Patients from OvertreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992