PARTIAL AVOIDANCE CONTINGENCIES1

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Rats were trained in a discrete-trial paradigm with no intertrial interval. The first response changed an auditory stimulus for the remainder of the trial. Shocks were delivered only at the end of the trial cycle. Avoidance contingencies were defined by the conditional probability of shock, given no response (P0), and the conditional probability of shock given a response (P1). The maximal avoidance contingency was P0 = 1.0, P1 = 0, and noncontingent conditions were those for which P0 = P1. In Experiment I, after training on the maximal contingency, three groups of subjects experienced either P0 = P1 = 0, P0 = P1 = 0.5, or P0 = P1 = 1.0. Eight of 10 subjects stopped responding under the noncontingent conditions. Experiment II studied partial contingencies by varying P0 and P1. For one group, P0 was reduced holding P1 = 0. Responding decreased to zero as P0 approached zero. A second group was studied under P1 > 0, holding P0 = 1.0. For three of the six rats in this group, responding decreased to zero with increasing P1. The other three maintained responding as P1 was increased up to the noncontingent, P1 = P0 = 1.0 value. The P0 group was also studied with P0 = P1 > 0, and half of these subjects responded. The results demonstrated two modes of response to weakening or eliminating the avoidance contingency. Some subjects were sensitive to contingency only, and insensitive to changes in shock density. Approximately one half of the subjects were sensitive to both contingency and shock density. This shared control was observed only when P1 > 0.

This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit: