SQUARE PEGS IN ROUND HOLES: PROGRAM EVALUATION AND ORGANIZATIONAL UNCERTAINTY
- 1 March 1981
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Policy Studies Journal
- Vol. 9 (5) , 644-666
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb00975.x
Abstract
It is argued that variation in uncertainty about social program goals and causal processes should influence the selection of evaluation designs and methods. Eighteen prominent evaluation reports are examined to contrast predicted evaluation strategies derived from theory about organizational uncertainty with the actual evaluation methods used. It was found that the actual design, measurement, and analysis procedures were frequently different from procedures that were compatible with the kinds of program uncertainty described in the evaluation reports. It is suggested that theory and practice in program evaluation can be improved by systematically incorporating organizational concepts that would contribute to the selection of evaluation methods.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Applying the Logic of Sample Surveys to Qualitative Case Studies: The Case Cluster MethodAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1979
- Goal Attainment ScalingEvaluation Quarterly, 1979
- Decision Makers' JudgmentsEvaluation Quarterly, 1978
- Metaevaluation ResearchEvaluation Quarterly, 1978
- Evaluation ResearchEvaluation Quarterly, 1977
- The Evaluation of Organizational Policy Making: A Political ModelReview of Educational Research, 1976
- FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH KNOWLEDGE USE AMONG FEDERAL EXECUTIVES*Policy Studies Journal, 1976
- The Evaluation of Broad-Aim Programs: Experimental Design, Its Difficulties, and an AlternativeAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1970
- Reforms as experiments.American Psychologist, 1969
- The Science of "Muddling Through"Public Administration Review, 1959