Comparison of Epidural and Intravenous Opioid Analgesia after Elective Caesarean Section
Open Access
- 1 February 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
- Vol. 20 (1) , 41-45
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x9202000108
Abstract
Patient acceptance is a particularly relevant method of assessing currently employed epidural and intravenous techniques of opioid analgesia after elective caesarean section. We have prospectively studied 71 such patients, randomised postoperatively to receive epidural morphine, intravenous morphine or intravenous pethidine. When compared with either intravenous opioid, epidural morphine provided twofold better average or excellent analgesia with 30% less drowsiness but with about 50% more pruritus. In spite of this troublesome complication, more patients (83% vs 74%) preferred epidural to intravenous opioid analgesia.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epidural morphine for post-Caesarean analgesiaCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1990
- Epidural Droperidol and Morphine for Postoperative PainAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1990
- A Comparison of Epidural and Intramuscular Morphine in Patients Following Cesarean SectionAnesthesiology, 1990
- Prophylactic Oral Naltrexone with Epidural MorphineAnesthesiology, 1990
- Intrathecal and Epidural Morphine Sulfate for Postcesarean Analgesia—A Clinical ComparisonAnesthesiology, 1988
- Epidural Opiates and Urinary RetentionAnesthesiology, 1988
- The Role of Epidural Morphine in the Postcesarean PatientAnesthesiology, 1983
- Epidural Morphine after Caesarean SectionAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, 1983
- Epidural morphine for analgesia after caesarean sectionCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1982
- Spinal opiate analgesia: Characteristics and principles of actionPain, 1981