Dalteparin for deep enous thrombosis: a hospital‐in‐the‐home program
- 1 March 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by AMPCo in The Medical Journal of Australia
- Vol. 168 (6) , 272-276
- https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb140160.x
Abstract
Objective: To assess the efficacy, safety and cost savings of home treatment of lower‐limb deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Setting: A hospital‐in‐the‐home treatment program. Patients: One hundred patients with acute lower limb DVT (53 proximal, 47 distal), and no contraindication to home treatment, were entered into the program from March 1995 to February 1997. Intervention: All patients received dalteparin, 200 units/kg subcutaneously, once daily for a minimum of five days, with commencement of oral anticoagulation (warfarin) on Day 2. Patients with proximal DVT had lung ventilation‐perfusion scans performed and were admitted to hospital for at least 24 hours. Patients with distal DVT were discharged directly to home treatment. Main outcome measures: Clinical responses and the results of sequential duplex ultrasonography at one week, one month, three months and six months. Results: There were no major, but six minor, bleeding complications, two of which led to dalteparin being withdrawn. Sixteen patients had lung ventilation‐perfusion scans showing a high probability of pulmonary embolism. All were asymptomatic, and follow‐up for at least three months showed no symptomatic thromboembolic events. Duplex ultrasonography showed progression of thrombosis in the first week of therapy in 13.2% of distal and 2.7% of proximal thromboses. Thereafter, distal DVT improved at a much greater rate than proximal DVT; after six months complete resolution was seen in 60.7% of distal and 18.5% of proximal thromboses, respectively. Cost saving was $197 per bed‐day equivalent compared with inpatient care. At 15 months' follow‐up, swelling and/or pain was reported by 49% of patients with distal DVT and 66% of those with proximal DVT. Conclusions: Once‐daily dalteparin therapy for DVT in a hospital‐in‐the‐home setting was safe, efficacious and cost effective. However, DVT resolution is a slow process, with significant long term morbidity.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Management of Venous ThromboembolismNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- A Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Administered Primarily at Home with Unfractionated Heparin Administered in the Hospital for Proximal Deep-Vein ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Treatment of Venous Thrombosis with Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin Administered in the Hospital as Compared with Subcutaneous Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Administered at HomeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Prospective 12-Year Follow-up Study of Clinical and Hemodynamic Sequelae After Deep Vein Thrombosis in Low-Risk Patients (Zürich Study)Circulation, 1996
- Propagation, rethrombosis and new thrombus formation after acute deep venous thrombosisJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1995
- Deep-Vein ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Comparison of efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparins and unfractionated heparin in initial treatment of deep venous thrombosis: a meta-analysisBMJ, 1994
- Subcutaneous Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Compared with Continuous Intravenous Heparin in the Treatment of Proximal-Vein ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- HeparinNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- NEED FOR LONG-TERM ANTICOAGULANT TREATMENT IN SYMPTOMATIC CALF-VEIN THROMBOSISThe Lancet, 1985