Does stenting save lives? understanding the strengths and limitations of meta-analysis
Open Access
- 31 May 2004
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 147 (5) , 756-758
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2003.12.008
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Short-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: Effects of stenting and institutional volume shiftsAmerican Heart Journal, 2002
- Relation Between Operator and Hospital Volume and Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in the Era of the Coronary StentJAMA, 2000
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Current Era Compared With 1985–1986Circulation, 2000
- Changing outcomes in percutaneous coronary interventions: A study of 34,752 procedures in Northern New England, 1990 to 1997Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999
- A Clinical Trial Comparing Three Antithrombotic-Drug Regimens after Coronary-Artery StentingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- A Randomized Comparison of Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapy after the Placement of Coronary-Artery StentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Coronary stenting for acute coronary dissection after coronary angioplasty: Implications of residual dissectionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
- A Comparison of Balloon-Expandable-Stent Implantation with Balloon Angioplasty in Patients with Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- A Randomized Comparison of Coronary-Stent Placement and Balloon Angioplasty in the Treatment of Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Meta-analysisJAMA, 1988