Who won the 1976 blind tasting of French Bordeaux and US Cabernets? Parametrics to the rescue
- 1 December 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Wine Research
- Vol. 15 (3) , 211-220
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09571260500109319
Abstract
The author revisits the heralded 1976 Paris blind tasting of US Cabernets and French Bordeaux. The conclusion reported in 1976, 1999, 2001 and 2003 was that the Americans won the competition outright. This conclusion derives from a non-parametric analysis of the data that converts wine rating scores to ranks, thereby producing invalid results. The author discusses: the biostatistical importance of the reanalysis; the practical impact of the earlier conclusions upon the economics of the California wine industry; and the heuristic importance of the burgeoning body of data analytic strategies for further elucidating the scientific understanding of judges' evaluations of wines.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF A TRAINED SENSORY PANEL1Journal of Sensory Studies, 2001
- DEVELOPMENT OF A ‘BIPOLAR’ R‐INDEX1Journal of Sensory Studies, 2000
- Use of principal component analysis for the evaluation of judge performance at wine competitionsJournal of Wine Research, 1999
- The evaluation of judges at wine competitions: the application of Eggshell plotsJournal of Wine Research, 1997
- A proposed approach for evaluating expert wine judge performance using descriptive statisticsJournal of Wine Research, 1996
- A Computer Program for Determining the Reliability of Dimensionally Scaled Data when the Numbers and Specific Sets of Examiners may Vary at Each AssessmentEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1988
- A Computer Program for Assessing the Reliability and Systematic Bias of Individual Measurements1Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976
- Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa.Psychological Bulletin, 1969
- Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.Psychological Bulletin, 1968
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960