DEVELOPMENT OF A ‘BIPOLAR’ R‐INDEX1
- 1 June 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Sensory Studies
- Vol. 15 (2) , 219-229
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459x.2000.tb00266.x
Abstract
A new ‘bipolar’ R‐index analysis was proposed and evaluated. Eighteen judges evaluated red color in eight wine samples by comparing each sample with the control. Judges indicated whether the sample had ‘more’, the 'same’, or ‘less’ red color than the control, and whether they were sure or unsure of their decision. Three computational methods were used to examine the results: the ‘traditional’ R‐index, the ‘bipolar’ R‐index (Rmore or Rless) and the ‘weighted‐bipolar’ R‐index. While all three methods provided consistent results, the ‘bipolar’ R‐indices reflected bidirectional differences among the samples thus providing more information. A refinement to the computation (‘weighted‐bipolar’ R‐index) was an approach for eliminating the bias associated with overestimation of the sample size and accordingly changed some of the significance levels. Further research is currently underway to expand the scope and application of this method.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Thurstonian models for variants of the method of tetradsBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1998
- HOW TO ESTIMATE AND USE THE VARIANCE OF d’ FROM DIFFERENCE TESTSJournal of Sensory Studies, 1997
- TABLE FOR TESTING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE R‐INDEXJournal of Sensory Studies, 1995
- UNDERSTANDING DISCRIMINATION TESTS: A USER‐FRIENDLY TREATMENT OF RESPONSE BIAS, RATING AND RANKING R‐INDEX TESTS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO SIGNAL DETECTIONJournal of Sensory Studies, 1992
- A multivariate model for discrimination methodsJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1986
- Expanded Tables for Conversion of a Proportion of Correct Responses (Pc to the Measure of Sensory Difference (d′) for the Triangular Method and the 3‐Alternative Forced Choice ProcedureJournal of Food Science, 1982
- Tables of d′ for the triangular method and the 3-AFC signal detection procedurePerception & Psychophysics, 1980
- A revised table of d’ for M-alternative forced choicePerception & Psychophysics, 1979
- RECOGNITION ASSESSED BY RATING AND RANKINGBritish Journal of Psychology, 1974
- A law of comparative judgment.Psychological Review, 1927