UNDERSTANDING DISCRIMINATION TESTS: A USER‐FRIENDLY TREATMENT OF RESPONSE BIAS, RATING AND RANKING R‐INDEX TESTS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO SIGNAL DETECTION
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Sensory Studies
- Vol. 7 (1) , 1-47
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459x.1992.tb00519.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Alternative Hedonic MeasuresJournal of Food Science, 1991
- Sensory Techniques for Measuring Differences in California Navel Oranges Treated with Doses of Gamma‐Radiation Below 0.6 KgrayJournal of Food Science, 1987
- Effectiveness of Sensory Difference Tests: Sequential Sensitivity Analysis for Liquid Food StimuliJournal of Food Science, 1986
- A multivariate model for discrimination methodsJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1986
- Initial Sensory Evaluation of Bing Cherries Treated with Low Doses of Gamma‐RadiationJournal of Food Science, 1985
- Relative singularity/mixedness judgements for selected taste stimuliPhysiology & Behavior, 1983
- Sensory Evaluation of High Vacuum Flame Sterilized Clingstone Peaches, Using Ranking and Signal Detection Measures with Minimal Cross‐Sensory InterferenceJournal of Food Science, 1983
- Expanded Tables for Conversion of a Proportion of Correct Responses (Pc to the Measure of Sensory Difference (d′) for the Triangular Method and the 3‐Alternative Forced Choice ProcedureJournal of Food Science, 1982
- A revised table of d’ for M-alternative forced choicePerception & Psychophysics, 1979
- Purity Effects and Distilled Water TasteNature, 1972