The Relation between Public Policy and Some Structural and Environmental Variables in the American States
- 1 March 1966
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 60 (1) , 73-82
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1953808
Abstract
What is the relationship between certain major structural aspects of state governments and the content of policies adopted in the states? Do the socio-economic environments of the states relate significantly to political structures or the type of policies enacted?The thesis advanced here is that differences in policy, at least in certain substantive areas, are more readily explained in terms of differences in the socio-economic environments of the states than by an examination of structural variables. It will also be maintained that, as policy is independent of structure, so structure is also largely independent of some major aspects of the environment. The specific structural variables to be examined are apportionment, party competitiveness, and divided party control between governors and their legislatures.Six specific propositions will be examined:Proposition 1. The more imbalance in a state's apportionment, the less likely the legislature is to pass “liberal” or welfare-oriented policies beneficial to urban groups.Proposition 2. The more imbalance in a state's apportionment, the less financial aid large cities will receive directly from the state.Proposition 3. The more imbalance in a state's apportionment, the less competitive will be its major parties.3a. the less competitive a state's two major parties, the less welfare-oriented will be the policies adopted by its legislature.Proposition 4. The more imbalance in a state's apportionment, the more likely it is that control of the executive and legislative branches will be divided between parties.4a. The more frequently control of the legislature and executive are divided, the less likely a state will be to adopt welfare-oriented policies.Proposition 5. The more industrialized a state, the more imbalance there will be in its apportionment system.Proposition 6. The more industrialized a state, the higher will be its welfare-orientation.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Malapportionment and Public Policy in the StatesThe Journal of Politics, 1965
- The American Legislative Process: Congress and the StatesThe Western Political Quarterly, 1964
- The Consequences of Malapportionment: A Note of CautionSocial Forces, 1964
- Classification of American State Party SystemsThe Journal of Politics, 1964
- Inter-Party Competition, Economic Variables, and Welfare Policies in the American StatesThe Journal of Politics, 1963
- The Outline of Ohio PoliticsThe Western Political Quarterly, 1960
- New England State PoliticsPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1959
- New England State PoliticsThe New England Quarterly, 1959
- A Taxonomic Approach to State Political Party StrengthThe Western Political Quarterly, 1958
- Political and Partisan Implications of State Legislative ApportionmentLaw and Contemporary Problems, 1952