First-Line First? Trends in Thiazide Prescribing for Hypertensive Seniors
Open Access
- 26 April 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Medicine
- Vol. 2 (4) , e80
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020080
Abstract
Evidence of reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality as well as cost support thiazide diuretics as the first-line choice for treatment of hypertension. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of senior hypertensives that received thiazide diuretics as first-line treatment, and to determine if cardiovascular and other potentially relevant comorbidities predict the choice of first-line therapy. British Columbia PharmaCare data were used to determine the cohort of seniors (residents aged 65 or older) who received their first reimbursed hypertension drug during the period 1993 to 2000. These individual records were linked to medical and hospital claims data using the British Columbia Linked Health Database to find the subset that had diagnoses indicating the presence of hypertension as well as cardiovascular and other relevant comorbidities. Rates of first-line thiazide prescribing as proportion of all first-line treatment were analysed, accounting for patient age, sex, overall clinical complexity, and potentially relevant comorbidities. For the period 1993 to 2000, 82,824 seniors who had diagnoses of hypertension were identified as new users of hypertension drugs. The overall rate at which thiazides were used as first-line treatment varied from 38% among senior hypertensives without any potentially relevant comorbidity to 9% among hypertensives with previous acute myocardial infarction. The rate of first-line thiazide diuretic prescribing for patients with and without potentially relevant comorbidities increased over the study period. Women were more likely than men, and older patients were more likely than younger, to receive first-line thiazide therapy. Findings indicate that first-line prescribing practices for hypertension are not consistent with the evidence from randomized control trials measuring morbidity and mortality. The health and financial cost of not selecting the most effective and least costly therapeutic options are significant.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of periodic letters on evidence-based drug therapy on prescribing behaviour: a randomized trialCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2004
- Drug Spending in CanadaMedical Care, 2004
- Whither Seniors’ Pharmacare: Lessons From (And For) CanadaHealth Affairs, 2003
- Major Outcomes in High-Risk Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Calcium Channel Blocker vs Diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)JAMA, 2002
- Major Cardiovascular Events in Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Doxazosin vs Chlorthalidone: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)JAMA, 2000
- Randomized Double-Blind Comparison of a Calcium Antagonist and a Diuretic in Elderly HypertensivesHypertension, 1999
- The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressureArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1997
- Effect of Diuretic-Based Antihypertensive Treatment on Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Older Diabetic Patients With Isolated Systolic HypertensionPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1996
- The fifth report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC V)Archives of internal medicine (1960), 1993
- The 1984 Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood PressureArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1984