Life with a Urostomy
- 1 February 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 65 (2) , 189-191
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1990.tb14697.x
Abstract
The quality of life of urostomy patients was assessed by direct interview. Specific problems, such as urine leakage, were documented and the size, site and quality of the stoma were assessed. The study included 41% patients; 83% noted an improvement in the quality of life since their urinary diversion and 90% were still able to work or continue to perform household duties. Urine leakage was the commonest problem and this was unrelated to the length of the stoma or the build of the patient. More important factors were the correct siting on the stoma and the avoidance of parastomal herniation. All patients emphasised the importance of the stoma therapist.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality of Life after Cystectomy Comparison between Patients with Conduit and those with Continent Caecal Reservoir Urinary DiversionBritish Journal of Urology, 1988
- Quality of Life Survey of Urinary Diversion Patients: Comparison of Ileal Conduits versus Continent Kock Ileal ReservoirsJournal of Urology, 1987
- Stomas Continent and IncontinentBritish Journal of Urology, 1987
- THE ENGINEERING OF AN ILEOSTOMY BAG: Application of Aerospace Technology Allied to MedicineThe Lancet, 1986
- Evaluation of new nonadhesive urostomy systemUrology, 1985
- Irritant skin reactions to urostomal adhesivesUrological Research, 1982
- Life with an Ilal Conduit: Results of Questonnaire Surveys of Patients and Urlogical SurgeonsBritish Journal of Urology, 1980
- Making of a stomaUrology, 1977
- Bladder Substitution After Pelvic EviscerationSurgical Clinics of North America, 1950