Arms Races and Cooperation
- 1 October 1985
- journal article
- Published by Project MUSE in World Politics
- Vol. 38 (1) , 118-146
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2010353
Abstract
States interested in reducing the level of arms competition with a rival can employ a variety of strategies designed to promote cooperation. We examine the ability of three important strategies—unilateral action, tacit bargaining, and negotiation—to reduce the intensity of arms races motivated by different patterns of preferences and complicated by different sources of uncertainty. The latter include strategic misrepresentation, imperfect intelligence, problems of interpretation, and problems of control. Examples are drawn from 19th- and 20th-century arms races that did not result in war.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Weapons and HopePhysics Today, 1984
- Reagan and the Russians: Crisis Bargaining Beliefs and the Historical RecordAmerican Political Science Review, 1984
- The Theory of Games and the Problem of International CooperationAmerican Political Science Review, 1983
- Armaments and Escalation: Two Competing HypothesesInternational Studies Quarterly, 1982
- The arms race‐war relationship: Why serious disputes matterArms Control, 1981
- The Cuban Missile Crisis: Trading the Jupiters in Turkey?Political Science Quarterly, 1980
- Arms Races and EscalationJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1979
- Cooperation under the Security DilemmaWorld Politics, 1978
- Belgian Neutrality: Its Origin and InterpretationThe American Historical Review, 1933