The Theory of Games and the Problem of International Cooperation
- 1 June 1983
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 77 (2) , 330-346
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1958919
Abstract
The Prisoner's Dilemma game, Rousseau's image of the Stag Hunt, and the concept of a security dilemma have all been used to support the argument that much international conflict is the result of anarchy at the global level rather than the aggressive intentions of governments. This article argues that the Prisoner's Dilemma and the Stag Hunt are usually inadequate models of the problem they have been used to illuminate, and that a security dilemma as commonly defined need not have the implications that are ascribed to it. It also argues that developing more adequate models of the general problem of enforcing agreements in a condition of anarchy will help us to understand better why international cooperation is more easily achieved in some areas than in others.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Deterrence and BargainingJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1982
- The Emergence of Cooperation among EgoistsAmerican Political Science Review, 1981
- International Regimes: Problems of Concept FormationWorld Politics, 1980
- The Geometry of the Arms RaceInternational Studies Quarterly, 1979
- Anarchy and Social Choice: Reflections on the International PolityWorld Politics, 1978
- Cooperation under the Security DilemmaWorld Politics, 1978
- Hockey Helmets, Concealed Weapons, and Daylight SavingJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1973
- Some Aspects of a Decision-Making Model in Nuclear Deterrence TheoryJournal of Peace Research, 1972
- Game theory, behavior, and the paradox of the Prisoner's Dilemma: three solutionsJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1970
- Games with Incomplete Information Played by ‘Bayesian’ Players, Part III. The Basic Probability Distribution of the GameManagement Science, 1968