Dextromethorphan and dextrorphan in rats: Common antitussives — Different behavioural profiles

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Summary—Dextromethorphan (DM), a widely used and well‐tolerated centrally acting antitussive, has been tested in several clinical trials for its antiepileptic and neuroprotective properties. However, the use of DM in these new clinical indications requires higher doses than antitussive doses, which may therefore induce phencyclidine (PCP)‐like side‐effects (memory and psychotomimetic disturbances) through its metabolic conversion to the active metabolite dextrorphan (DX), a more potent PCP‐like non‐competitive antagonist at the N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) receptor than DM. Thus, we compared the behavioural effects in rats of intraperitoneal administration of DM and DX on motor activity in an open field and on learning and memory in the Morris water maze. DM (20, 30, 40 mg/kg) produced a dose‐dependent decrease in both locomotion and stereotyped behaviour with a slight ataxia for the highest dose. DX (20, 30,40 mg/kg) induced a dose‐dependent increase in locomotion and stereotypies (swaying, turning) with moderate ataxia. Assessments of learning and memory were performed with lower doses of DM (10, 20, 30 mg/kg) and DX (5, 10, 15 mg/kg) because of motivational deficits (40 mg/kg of DM, 20–40 mg/kg of DX) and motor disorders (30, 40 mg/kg of DX) in the cue learning procedure. DX (10, 15 mg/kg) impaired spatial learning with a long‐lasting effect for the highest dose whereas 5 mg/kg of DX and DM (10–30 mg/kg) did not. Only 15 mg/kg of DX appeared to slightly impair working memory. DM (10–30 mg/kg) and DX (5–15 mg/kg) did not impair reference memory. Thus, the two antitussives DM and DX induced different behavioural effects suggesting sedative effects for DM and PCP‐like effects for DX. However, PCP‐like side‐effects with DM remain possible through its metabolic conversion to DX, with very high doses and/or in extensive metabolizers and/or in aged subjects prone to cognitive dysfunction. Therefore, the identification of DM metabolism phenotype, an adapted prescription and a pharmacological modulation of the DM metabolism may avoid adverse effects.