Comparison of spiral and FLASH phase velocity mapping, with and without breath‐holding, for the assessment of left and right coronary artery blood flow velocity
Open Access
- 23 December 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Vol. 19 (1) , 40-49
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10434
Abstract
Purpose To develop high temporal resolution coronary artery spiral phase velocity mapping sequences and to compare the results obtained with those from FLASH sequences. Materials and Methods Velocity curves were obtained in eight left and eight right coronary arteries using breath‐hold interleaved spiral (BH_SP), free‐breathing interleaved spiral (FB_SP), breath‐hold segmented FLASH (BH_FL), and free‐breathing FLASH (FB_FL) sequences. Spatial resolution, temporal resolution, and acquisition durations (cardiac cycles) were as follows—BH_SP: 0.9 mm × 0.9 mm, 30 msec, 20 cycles; FB_SP: 0.9 mm × 0.9 mm, 42 msec, 100 cycles; BH_FL: 0.9 mm × 1.8 mm, 70 msec (effective), 20 cycles; FB_FL: 0.9 mm × 1.8 mm, 30 msec, 480 cycles. Peak systolic, peak diastolic, and mean velocities were compared between sequences. Results For left and right arteries, the FB_SP velocity profiles closely followed those from the FB_FL sequence. By comparison, the BH_FL sequence failed to resolve the sharp peaks in the temporal velocity profiles of the right coronary artery, significantly underestimating the peak systolic (88 mm/second vs. 252 mm/second, P < 0.001), peak diastolic (114 mm/second vs. 153 mm/second, P < 0.01), and mean (56 mm/second vs. 93 mm/second, P < 0.001) velocities. For the less mobile left artery, the peak systolic, peak diastolic, and mean velocities were also underestimated by the BH_FL sequence, although this only reached statistical significance for the systolic peak (80 mm/second vs. 135 mm/second, P < 0.01), 142 mm/second vs. 168 mm/second, (P = ns), and 87 mm/second vs. 101 mm/second, (P = ns) respectively. Conclusion We have shown that the FB_SP sequence developed agrees well with the FB_FL sequence, while the study duration is reduced by a factor of 10 for the same spatial resolution. By comparison, the BH_FL sequence underestimates flow velocities, particularly in the more mobile right coronary artery. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2004;19:40–49.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantification of coronary artery volume flow rate using fast velocity-encoded cine MR imaging.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1997
- Measurement of Coronary Blood Flow and Flow Reserve Using Magnetic Resonance ImagingCardiology, 1997
- Assessment of Coronary Arterial Flow and Flow Reserve in Humans With Magnetic Resonance ImagingCirculation, 1996
- Assessment of flow in the right human coronary artery by magnetic resonance phase contrast velocity measurement: Effects of cardiac and respiratory motionMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1996
- Effects of through-plane myocardial motion on phase-difference and complex-difference measurements of absolute coronary artery flowJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1996
- Measurement of Absolute Epicardial Coronary Artery Flow and Flow Reserve With Breath-Hold Cine Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance ImagingCirculation, 1995
- Respiratory Motion of the Heart: Kinematics and the Implications for the Spatial Resolution in Coronary ImagingMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1995
- A complex‐difference phase‐contrast technique for measurement of volume flow ratesJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1995
- The application of breath hold phase velocity mapping techniques to the measurement of coronary artery blood flow velocity: Phantom data and initial in vivo resultsMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1994
- Coronary flow velocity dynamics in normal and diseased arteriesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993