Multifocal pattern VEP perimetry: analysis of sectoral waveforms
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Documenta Ophthalmologica
- Vol. 98 (2) , 183-196
- https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1002449304052
Abstract
Purpose: The objective detection of local visual field defects using multi-focal pattern visual evoked potentials (VEP) has recently been described. The individual waveforms show variable polarity in different parts of the visual field due to underlying cortical convolutions. Normal trace arrays were examined to determine if certain areas of similar waveform could be grouped for analysis, while minimising cancellation of data. Method: The VEP was assessed using multi-focal pseudo-randomly alternated pattern stimuli which were cortically scaled in size. Bipolar occipital electrodes were used for recording. Waveforms were compared for different locations within the field up to 25° of eccentricity. Analysis of sectors showing similarly shaped waveforms was performed. Twelve normal subjects were studied. Result: Grouping waveforms by sectors of similar waveform increased the total calculated upper hemifield amplitude by 60%, compared with simple summations of responses for the whole hemifield. The inferior hemifield showed more consistent waveforms throughout, with the amplitude only increasing by 11% with sectoral summation. Intra-subject variability (10.6%) is less for sectors than for individual points (17.3%). Inter-subject amplitude differences are high, calculated at 56% for individual points and 45% for sectors. Conclusions: Due to differences in waveform as a result of underlying cortical anatomy, individual VEP responses from multifocal recordings should be grouped as sectors along the vertical meridian and above and below the horizontal, rather than by hemifields or quadrants. This finding is significant if one is considering within-field grouping strategies similar to the glaucoma hemifield test used in conventional perimetry, or reporting derived overall VEP amplitudes and latencies from a multifocal recording. Large amplitude variations between individuals and small signals from horizontal and upper field seen in single channel recording, still limit the application of this technique as a form of objective perimetry.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Objective Perimetry in GlaucomaSurvey of Ophthalmology, 1999
- Electrode position and the multi-focal visual-evoked potential: Role in objective visual field assessmentAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology, 1998
- M and P Components of the VEP and their Visual Field DistributionVision Research, 1997
- Objective detection of hemifield and quadrantic field defects by visual evoked cortical potentials.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1996
- Clinical evaluation of VEPs to interleaved checkerboard reversal stimulation of central, hemi- and peripheral fieldsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1995
- Representation of the visual field in the occipital striate cortex.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1994
- Motion-onset visual-evoked potentials as a function of retinal eccentricity in manCognitive Brain Research, 1993
- The asymmetrical visual evoked potential to pattern reversal in one half field and its significance for the analysis of visual field defects.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1977
- Visual Evoked Responses in the Assessment of Field Defects in GlaucomaArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1975
- Differences between the occipital distribution of upper and lower field pattern-evoked responses in manBrain Research, 1971