A concise scale for the assessment of attitudes towards institutional authority
- 1 August 1982
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Australian Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 34 (2) , 195-204
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00049538208257811
Abstract
This report describes the development of a concise scale to assess attitudes toward institutional authorities. The Scale is shown to be highly reliable upon cross‐validation, using 100 Australian and 100 British tertiary students. The generality of the Scale is demonstrated through significant inter‐correlations between the Scale's four sub‐scales, which assess attitudes toward different institutional authorities. Predicted differences between student supporters of “conservative” and left‐wing political parties in Australia and Britain provide validity. Further validity is given through comparisons of prison officers, probation officers, persons “on bond” and prisoners. In addition, the Scale and each of the sub‐scales are shown to be significantly correlated with a questionnaire measure of “conservatism”. The nature and purpose of the Scale are differentiated from those of existing measures of authoritarianism and conservatism.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conservatism, acquiescence, and the effects of sample heterogeneityAustralian Journal of Psychology, 1980
- Is the influence of acquiescence on “catchphrase” type attitude scale items not so mythical after all?Australian Journal of Psychology, 1979
- Is the Dogmatism Scale Irreversible?South African Journal of Psychology, 1979
- The Generality of Attitude to AuthorityHuman Relations, 1979
- Ray's balanced Dogmatism scale re‐examinedBritish Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1977
- Factor structure of the conservatism scaleAustralian Psychologist, 1975
- Non-Ethnocentric AuthoritarianismJournal of Sociology, 1972
- An “attitude to authority” scaleAustralian Psychologist, 1971
- Using Balanced Scales to Control AcquiescenceSociometry, 1970
- The generality of attitudes toward authority and nonauthority figures.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1957