Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort

This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:

• Initial Severity and Antidepressant Benefits: A Meta-Analysis of Data Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration
  PLoS Medicine, 2008
• Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review
  BMJ, 2006
• The case of the misleading funnel plot
  BMJ, 2006
• Peer-Reviewed Publication of Clinical Trials Completed for Pediatric Exclusivity
  JAMA, 2006
• Relationship between drug company funding and outcomes of clinical psychiatric research
  Psychological Medicine, 2006
• Fate of biomedical research protocols and publication bias in France: retrospective cohort study
  BMJ, 2005
• The need for research in primary care
  The Lancet, 2003
• Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
  Published by Elsevier ,1998
• Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
  Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
• Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
  JAMA, 1995