Pilot Differences and Motion Cuing Effects on Simulated Helicopter Hover
- 1 June 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Vol. 26 (3) , 249-256
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088402600301
Abstract
The effects that cues of aircraft motion, delays in visual scene, and movement of a ship model have on pilots' ability to hover a simulated helicopter near a destroyer-class ship were examined. Twelve pilots were tested in a within-subject factorial combination of fixed-base, moving-base, and G-seat conditions in which delays of 66 or 128 ms existed in the simulator's visual display and the pilots had to hover near a moving or stationary ship. Best control performance was seen under the moving-base conditions, whereas poorest control was associated with the fixed-base simulation. An intermediate level of performance was produced by the G-seat. In addition, visual delay affected control of the roll axis of the simulation, and interactions between pilots and motion cuing and visual delay were seen. little effect.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Optimal Control Model Analysis of Data from a Simulated Hover TaskPublished by Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) ,1981
- Lead/Lag Dynamics to Compensate for Display DelaysJournal of Aircraft, 1980
- The Relationship between Flight Simulator Motion and Training RequirementsHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1979
- Time-Delay Problems Encountered in Integrating the Advanced Simulator for Undergraduate Pilot TrainingJournal of Aircraft, 1977
- Delay of visual feedback in aircraft simulators.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1977