Explaining Variation In The Success Of Extreme Right Parties In Western Europe
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Comparative Political Studies
- Vol. 36 (4) , 432-466
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414003251176
Abstract
Methodological problems associated with selection bias and interaction effects have hindered the accumulation of systematic knowledge about the factors that explain cross-national variation in the success of extreme right parties. The author uses a statistical analysis that takes account of these problems to examine the effect of electoral institutions, unemployment, and immigration on the support for these parties. The data set used in this analysis is new and spans 19 countries and 165 national elections. There are four substantive conclusions. The first is that it is important to distinguish between neofascist and populist parties on the extreme right because their fortunes depend on different factors. The second is that populist parties do better in countries where the district magnitude is larger and more seats are allocated in upper tiers. The third is that although immigration has a positive effect on populist parties irrespective of the unemployment level, unemployment only matters when immigration is high. Finally, there is evidence that the permissiveness of the electoral system mediates the effect of immigration on populist parties.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- The single‐issue party thesis: Extreme right parties and the immigration issueWest European Politics, 1999
- ELECTORAL RULES AND ELECTORAL COORDINATIONAnnual Review of Political Science, 1999
- The ecological correlates of right–wing extremism in Western EuropeEuropean Journal of Political Research, 1998
- Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal Democratic StatesInternational Migration Review, 1995
- Small N's and Big Conclusions: An Examination of the Reasoning in Comparative Studies Based on a Small Number of CasesSocial Forces, 1991
- Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral SystemsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1990
- How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative PoliticsPolitical Analysis, 1990
- The national front in France ‐ a single‐issue movement?West European Politics, 1988
- Tobit models: A surveyJournal of Econometrics, 1984
- Two Strategies for the Study of PopulismPolitical Studies, 1982