Ideology as Episodic Discourse: The Case of the Iranian Revolution
- 1 June 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in American Sociological Review
- Vol. 57 (3) , 353-379
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2096241
Abstract
Sociological research on ideology and revolution has been guided by three models: the subjectivist model, which proposes that ideology re-orients disoriented and discontented individuals in situations of social strain; the organizational model, which analyzes ideology in terms of organized contention for power and emphasizes the organizational context in which ideological producers respond to challenges to their authority; and the Marxian model, which attributes causal primacy to class conflict in its analysis of ideological dynamics. I argue for a fourth model, one that treats ideology as an episodic discourse, consisting of a general principles, concepts, symbols, and rituals that shape human actions in a particular historical period, and considers revolutionary phenomenon as a particular mode of historical action constituted by revolutionary ideology. The Iranian Revolution is examined to demonstrate the fruitfulness of the episodic discourse model.This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- State Power and the Strength of Civil Society in the Southern Cone of Latin AmericaPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1985
- Theories of Revolution: The Third GenerationWorld Politics, 1980