Elective Endovascular versus Open Surgical Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Systematic Review of Short-term Results
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 224 (3) , 739-747
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2243011675
Abstract
To summarize and compare published short-term results of elective endovascular and open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. A MEDLINE search of the English literature was performed. Studies with at least 10 patients in each treatment group were included if they reported patient characteristics, complications, and mortality. Two reviewers independently extracted the data. A random-effects model was used to pool the data and calculate pooled odds ratios (endovascular vs open surgical repair). Nine studies were included, reporting results of 1,318 procedures (687 endovascular repair and 631 open surgical repair). Mean blood loss was 456 mL for endovascular repair and 1,202 mL for open surgical repair (P =.003). On average, patients undergoing endovascular repair spent 0.5 days in the intensive care unit and 3.9 days in the hospital, and patients undergoing open surgical repair spent 2.2 days (P =.04) in the intensive care unit and 10.3 days (P =.02) in the hospital. The pooled 30-day-mortality was 0.03 for endovascular repair (95% CI: 0.02, 0.04) and 0.04 for open surgical repair (95% CI: 0.00, 0.07) (P =.03), and the odds ratio was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.33, 0.92). The pooled local and/or vascular complication rate was 0.16 for endovascular repair (95% CI: 0.06, 0.25) and 0.12 for open surgical repair (95% CI: 0.06, 0.18) (P =.46), and the odds ratio was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.62, 1.54). The pooled systemic and/or remote complication rate was 0.17 for endovascular repair (95% CI: 0.09, 0.25) and 0.44 for open surgical repair (95% CI: 0.21, 0.66) (P <.001), and the odds ratio was 0.22 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.45). On the basis of this systematic review, endovascular repair results in less blood loss, shorter intensive care unit and hospital stays, lower 30-day mortality, and lower systemic and/or remote complication rates than those of open surgical repair.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Complications in the Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: a Risk Factor AnalysisEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 1999
- Mid-term results of a second generation bifurcated endovascular graft for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: The French Vanguard trialJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1999
- Realistic Expectations for Patients with Stent-graft Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Results of a European Multicentre RegistryEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 1999
- Physiological comparison of open and endovascular aneurysm repairBritish Journal of Surgery, 1999
- Endoluminal Grafting of Infrarenal Aortic AneurysmsThe Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, 1999
- Endovascular AAA treatment: Expensive prestige or economic alternative?European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 1997
- Reporting standards for infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repairJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1997
- Some Statistical Methods for Combining Experimental ResultsInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1990
- Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical DataJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 1988
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986