Some Statistical Methods for Combining Experimental Results
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
- Vol. 6 (1) , 5-30
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462300008916
Abstract
Advances in science and technology are generally the product of multiple investigations. This article discusses statistical methods for combining empirical results from a series of different experiments or clinical investigations. We delineate the steps an assessor might take in combining data from different studies and provide references for topics not discussed in detail. The article reviews some of the most commonly used statistical techniques for combining results in the medical and social sciences.The expressionmeta-analysisrefers to the practice of using statistical methods to combine the outcomes of a series of different experiments or investigations. The terminology arises because a meta-analysis uses a study as the unit of observation, and, thus, the data point for each study is itself a statistical summary based on an analysis of primary data.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- [Selection Models and the File Drawer Problem]: Comment: Assumptions and Procedures in the File Drawer ProblemStatistical Science, 1988
- Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical DataJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 1988
- Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trialsProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1985
- Estimation of Effect Size under Nonrandom Sampling: The Effects of Censoring Studies Yielding Statistically Insignificant Mean DifferencesJournal of Educational Statistics, 1984
- Reporting on Methods in Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trialControlled Clinical Trials, 1981
- The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.Psychological Bulletin, 1979
- The Importance of Beta, the Type II Error and Sample Size in the Design and Interpretation of the Randomized Control TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978