Cost, Performance, and Size Tradeoffs for Different Levels in a Memory Hierarchy*
- 1 April 1976
- journal article
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in Computer
- Vol. 9 (4) , 43-51
- https://doi.org/10.1109/c-m.1976.218559
Abstract
Until recently, electronically addressable devices such as ferrite core, plated wire, semiconductor memories, and electromechanically addressable devices such as magnetic tapes, disks, and drums were the few technologies from which a computer system designer could build a memory system. A number of different new technologies and devices have been developed that close the "access gap"14between the two dissimilar technologies mentioned above. These include charge-coupled devices (CCD's),2bubble memories,4electron beam addressed memories (EBAM),17and domain tip propagation (DOT).16Other technologies like CMOS1and integrated injection logic (I2L),9compete directly with the existing technologies. Table 1 (see p. 46) shows the possibility of a six-level hierarchy and some cost and performance projections for these technologies.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tutorial: Computer System Advantages of Magnetic Bubble MemoriesComputer, 1975
- Storage Hierarchy Optimization ProcedureIBM Journal of Research and Development, 1975
- Electronic Disks in the 1980'sComputer, 1975
- Bridging the memory access gapPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1975
- Performance of replacement algorithms with different page sizesComputer, 1974
- On Optimization of Storage HierarchiesIBM Journal of Research and Development, 1974
- Cost-performance evaluation of memory hierarchiesIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1972
- THE EVALUATION AND SELECTION OF TECHNOLOGIES FOR COMPUTER STORAGE SYSTEMSAIP Conference Proceedings, 1972
- Storage hierarchies: Gaps, cliffs, and trendsIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1971
- Magnetic film domain-wall motion devicesIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1970