EUS or percutaneous CT/US-guided FNA for suspected pancreatic cancer: when tissue is the issue
- 30 June 2006
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Vol. 63 (7) , 976-978
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2005.12.012
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A randomized comparison of EUS-guided FNA versus CT or US-guided FNA for the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesionsGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2006
- Pancreatic FNA in 1000 cases: a comparison of imaging modalitiesPublished by Elsevier ,2005
- A first report of tumor seeding because of EUS-guided FNA of a pancreatic adenocarcinomaGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005
- Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Multidetector Computed Tomography for Detecting and Staging Pancreatic CancerAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2004
- Endoscopic Ultrasound–Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Patients With Suspected Pancreatic Cancer: Diagnostic Accuracy and Acute and 30-Day ComplicationsAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2003
- Lower frequency of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with pancreatic cancer diagnosed by EUS-guided FNA vs. percutaneous FNAGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2003
- Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of pancreatic massesAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2002
- Complications of Ultrasonically Guided Fine-Needle Abdominal Biopsy: Results of a Multicenter Italian Study and Review of the LiteratureScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1988