Care of the umbilical cord after birth: A limited review of recent literature
Open Access
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Paediatrics & Child Health
- Vol. 4 (2) , 105-107
- https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/4.2.105
Abstract
A 1992 meta-analysis did not find enough evidence to recommend one method of umbilical cord care as the ‘best’. However, certain agents were deemed acceptable including triple dye, silver sulfadiazine and antibiotic ointments. In this paper, the authors sought to discover whether there was now evidence to support one specific method of cord care over others for the prevention of bacterial infection. After a limited search of the English language literature published in the past 10 years, little evidence was found to suggest that treatments to sterilize or speed up the drying of the umbilical cord were either routinely necessary or efficacious. Results from nine studies are summarized in this paper.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cleaning Solutions and Bacterial Colonization in Promoting Healing and Early Separation of the Umbilical Cord in Healthy NewbornsCanadian Journal of Public Health, 1997
- Antiseptic cord care reduces bacterial colonization but delays cord detachment.Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal & Neonatal, 1994
- A comparative study of neonates' umbilical cord management .1994
- What cord care--if any?Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1993
- Staphylococcus aureus still colonizes the untreated neonatal umbilicusJournal of Hospital Infection, 1992
- Cord care appraised.1990
- Hydrophobic Material in Routine Umbilical Cord Care and Prevention of Infections in Newborn InfantsScandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1990
- Time of separation of the umbilical cord: a comparative study of treatment with alcohol and RikosprayEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1989
- A COMPARISON OF UMBILICAL-CORD TREATMENT IN THE CONTROL OF SUPERFICIAL INFECTION1988