Assessing Differential Item Functioning in Direct Writing Assessments: Problems and an Example
- 1 June 1995
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Educational Measurement
- Vol. 32 (2) , 163-178
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1995.tb00461.x
Abstract
The recent emphasis on various types of performance assessments raises questions concerning the differential effects of such assessments on population subgroups. Procedures for detecting differential item functioning (DIF) in data from performance assessments are available but may be hindered by problems that stem from this mode of assessment. Foremost among these are problems related to finding an appropriate matching variable. These problems are discussed and results are presented for three methods for DIF detection in polytomous items using data from a direct writing assessment. The purpose of the study is to examine the effects of using different combinations of internal and external matching variables. The procedures included a generalized Mantel‐Haenszel statistic, a technique based on meta‐analysis methodology, and logistic discriminant function analysis. In general, the results did not support the use of an external matching criterion and indicated that continued problems may be expected in attempts to assess DIF in performance assessments.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Logistic Discriminant Function Analysis for DIF Identification of Polytomously Scored ItemsJournal of Educational Measurement, 1993
- Procedures for Extending Item Bias Detection Techniques to Polytomously Scored ItemsApplied Measurement in Education, 1993
- A Conceptual Analysis of Differential Item Functioning in Terms of a Multidimensional Item Response ModelApplied Psychological Measurement, 1992
- A Didactic Explanation of Item Bias, Item Impact, and Item Validity From a Multidimensional PerspectiveJournal of Educational Measurement, 1992
- Complex, Performance-Based Assessment: Expectations and Validation CriteriaEducational Researcher, 1991
- Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Logistic Regression ProceduresJournal of Educational Measurement, 1990
- Validation Methods for Direct Writing AssessmentApplied Measurement in Education, 1990
- DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING AND THE MANTEL‐HAENSZEL PROCEDUREETS Research Report Series, 1986
- DEMONSTRATING THE UTILITY OF THE STANDARDIZATION APPROACH TO ASSESSING UNEXPECTED DIFFERENTIAL ITEM PERFORMANCE ON THE SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE TESTJournal of Educational Measurement, 1986
- Separate sample logistic discriminationBiometrika, 1972