Does the Limit Order Routing Decision Matter?
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 15 (1) , 159-194
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/15.1.159
Abstract
We examine the impact deciding to route limit orders away from the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) has on three dimensions of execution quality with methodologies controlling for market conditions and order submission strategies. Overall differences in limit order execution quality between regional stock exchanges and the NYSE are small, suggesting that the order routing decision may not affect retail limit order traders substantively. Conditioning on the distance between the limit order’s price and prevailing quotes, however, reveals systematic differences in execution quality. This implies that brokers can strategically route limit orders to improve retail limit order execution quality.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Order Flow Distribution, Bid–Ask Spreads, and Liquidity Costs: Merrill Lynch's Decision to Cease Routinely Routing Orders to Regional Stock ExchangesJournal of Financial Intermediation, 1998
- Does order preferencing matter?Journal of Financial Economics, 1998
- A cross-exchange comparison of execution costs and information flow for NYSE-listed stocksJournal of Financial Economics, 1997
- Do Competing Specialists and Preferencing Dealers Affect Market Quality?The Review of Financial Studies, 1997
- Limit Order TradingThe Journal of Finance, 1996
- Cream-Skimming or Profit-Sharing? The Curious Role of Purchased Order FlowThe Journal of Finance, 1996
- An Empirical Analysis of the Limit Order Book and the Order Flow in the Paris BourseThe Journal of Finance, 1995
- An Integrated Model of Market and Limit OrdersJournal of Financial Intermediation, 1995
- Is the Electronic Open Limit Order Book Inevitable?The Journal of Finance, 1994
- Differences in Execution Prices Among the NYSE, the Regionals, and the NASDSSRN Electronic Journal, 1991