RULES OF INDEXING: A CRITIQUE OF MENTALISM IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL THEORY
- 1 February 1990
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Journal of Documentation
- Vol. 46 (2) , 81-101
- https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026855
Abstract
A rule‐governed derivation of an indexing phrase from the text of a document is, in Wittgenstein's sense, a practice, rather than a mental operation explained by reference to internally represented and tacitly known rules. Some mentalistic proposals for theory in information retrieval are criticised in light of Wittgenstein's remarks on following a rule. The conception of rules as practices shifts the theoretical significance of the social role of retrieval practices from the margins to the centre of enquiry into foundations of information retrieval. The abstracted notion of a cognitive act of ‘information processing’ deflects attention from fruitful directions of research.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION: A BRIEF REVIEWJournal of Documentation, 1986
- BIBLIOGRAPHIC CLASSIFICATION THEORY AND TEXT LINGUISTICS: ABOUTNESS ANALYSIS, INTERTEXTUALITY AND THE COGNITIVE ACT OF CLASSIFYING DOCUMENTSJournal of Documentation, 1986
- Buchanan, Locke and Wittgenstein on classificationJournal of Information Science, 1981
- Knowledge, information, and information scienceJournal of Information Science, 1980
- Utility-theoretic indexing: A note on Wilson's noteJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1979
- Utility-theoretic indexingJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1979
- The nature of informationJournal of Information Science, 1979
- ‘Aboutness’ as a strategy for retrieval in the social sciencesAslib Proceedings, 1978
- Machine indexing: Linguistic and semiotic implicationsJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1976
- Rules and PracticesThe Philosophical Review, 1969