Biosynthesis of lysosomal endopeptidases

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Despite the clear differences between the amino acid sequence and enzymatic specificity of aspartic and cysteine endopeptidases, the biosynthetic processing of lysosomal members of these two families is very similar. With in vitro translation and pulse‐chase analysis in tissue culture cells, the biosynthesis of cathepsin D, a aspartic protease, and cathepsins B, H and L, cysteine proteases, are compared. Both aspartic and cysteine endopeptidases undergo cotranslational cleavage of an amino‐terminal signal peptide that mediates transport across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. Addition of high‐mannose carbohydrate also occurs cotranslationally in the lumen of the ER. Proteases of both enzyme classes are initially synthesized as inactive proenzymes possessing amino‐terminal activation peptides. Removal of the propeptide generates an active single‐chain enzyme. Whether the single‐chain enzyme undergoes asymmetric cleavage into a light and a heavy chain appears to be cell type specific. Finally, late during their biosynthesis both classes of enzymes undergo amino acid trimming, losing a few amino acid residues at the cleavage site between the light and heavy chains and/or at their carboxyltermini. During biosynthesis these enzymes are also secreted to some extent. In most cells the secreted enzyme is the proenzyme bearing some complex carbohydrate. Under certain physiological conditions the inactive secreted enzymes may become activated as a result of a conformational change that may or may not result in autolysis. Analysis of the biochemical nature of the various processing steps helps define the cellular pathway followed by newly synthesized proteases targeted to the lysosome.