TEMPORAL CONSTRAINT ON CHOICE: SENSITIVITY AND BIAS IN MULTIPLE SCHEDULES
Open Access
- 1 May 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 39 (3) , 405-426
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1983.39-405
Abstract
In multiple schedules of reinforcement, ratios of responses in successive components are relatively insensitive to ratios of obtained reinforcers. An analysis is proposed that attributes changes in absolute response rates to concurrent interactions between programmed reinforcement and extraneous reinforcement in other components. The analysis predicts that ratios of responses in successive components vary with reinforcer ratios, qualified by a term describing the reinforcement context, that is, programmed and extraneous reinforcers. Two main predictions from the analysis were confirmed in an experiment in which pigeons' responses were reinforced in the components of a multiple schedule and analog extraneous reinforcement was scheduled for an alternative response in each component. Sensitivity of response and time ratios to reinforcer ratios in the multiple schedules varied as a function of the rate of extraneous reinforcers. Bias towards responding in one component of the multiple schedule varied as an inverse function of the ratios of extraneous reinforcer rate in the two components. The data from this and previous studies of multiple‐concurrent performance were accurately predicted by our analysis and supported our contention that the allocation of behavior in multiple‐schedule components depends on the relative values of concurrently‐available reinforcers within each component.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- ON THE EFFECTS OF COMPONENT DURATIONS AND COMPONENT REINFORCEMENT RATES IN MULTIPLE SCHEDULESJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1982
- PREFERENCE IN CONCURRENT VARIABLE‐INTERVAL FIXED‐RATIO SCHEDULESJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1982
- OPTIMIZATION AND THE MATCHING LAW AS ACCOUNTS OF INSTRUMENTAL BEHAVIORJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1981
- THE ROLE OF DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULI IN CONCURRENT PERFORMANCESJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1981
- MATCHING, UNDERMATCHING, AND OVERMATCHING IN STUDIES OF CHOICEJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1979
- THE RELATIVE LAW OF EFFECT: EFFECTS OF SHOCK INTENSITY ON RESPONSE STRENGTH IN MULTIPLE SCHEDULES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1978
- ON TWO TYPES OF DEVIATION FROM THE MATCHING LAW: BIAS AND UNDERMATCHING1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974
- CONCURRENT PERFORMANCES: STIMULUS‐CONTROL GRADIENTS DURING SCHEDULES OF SIGNALLED AND UNSIGNALLED CONCURRENT REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974
- CONCURRENT PERFORMANCES: REINFORCEMENT INTERACTION AND RESPONSE INDEPENDENCE1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1963
- INDEPENDENCE OF CONCURRENT RESPONDING MAINTAINED BY INTERVAL SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1962