The Negative Pressure Device for Erectile Disorders: When Does it Fail?
- 1 May 1993
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 149 (5 Part 2) , 1285-1287
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36369-3
Abstract
Of 74 men with erectile dysfunction who used a vacuum device at home only 20 were satisfied with the erections achieved. The device was offered only to men who had not been helped by sexual counseling, self-injection therapy or venous surgery, and to 8 patients who had had problems with a penile implant. Fibrosis reduces the chances of success with the vacuum device, and only 2 of 14 such patients used it successfully. In all 9 patients with psychogenic impotence the device failed. Although 9 men did achieve erections with the device, they disliked it so much that they did not begin regular use. Our disappointing overall result was probably due to negative patient selection.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Hemodynamics of Vacuum Constriction Erections: Assessment by Color Doppler UltrasoundJournal of Urology, 1992
- Vacuum Tumescence Devices: The Role of Papaverine in the Selection of PatientsJournal of Urology, 1991
- Skin Necrosis Caused by Use of Negative Pressure Device for Erectile ImpotenceJournal of Urology, 1990
- Treating Erectile Dysfunction with External Vacuum Devices: Impact Upon Sexual, Psychological and Marital FunctioningJournal of Urology, 1990
- The Effect of Vacuum Devices on Penile HemodynamicsJournal of Urology, 1990
- The Effect of Subatmospheric Pressure on the Simian PenisJournal of Urology, 1989
- Negative Pressure Devices in the Explanted Penile Prosthesis PopulationJournal of Urology, 1989
- Editorial CommentJournal of Urology, 1989
- Vacuum Constriction Device for Management of Erectile ImpotenceJournal of Urology, 1989
- Noninvasive device to produce and maintain an erection-like stateUrology, 1986