Methodologic Issues in Randomized Controlled Trials of Surgical Interventions
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- section i-symposium
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Vol. 413 (413) , 25-32
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000080539.81794.54
Abstract
A physician’s ability to make conclusions about the relative efficacy of interventions based on their clinical experience is limited frequently. Therefore, surgeons commonly use research evidence to guide their clinical practice. The randomized controlled trial is the strongest study design. However, randomization in itself does not guarantee the trial results are valid (free from bias). Understanding the potential impact of various methodologic features of a randomized controlled trial allows a clinician to determine the validity of a trial. We present a guide for evaluating the validity of randomized controlled trials giving special consideration to issues confronted in surgical trials.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risks and Benefits of Estrogen Plus Progestin in Healthy Postmenopausal Women: Principal Results From the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled TrialJAMA, 2002
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?Published by Elsevier ,1998
- Surgical practice is evidence basedBritish Journal of Surgery, 1997
- Arthroscope-guided surgery versus nonoperative treatment for limited degenerative osteoarthritis of the femorotibial joint in patients over 50 years of age: A prospective comparative studyArthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 1993
- Surgical evaluation at the crossroadsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1993
- Estrogen replacement therapy and coronary heart disease: A quantitative assessment of the epidemiologic evidencePreventive Medicine, 1991
- The arthroscopic treatment of unicompartmental gonarthrosis: A five-year follow-up study of abrasion arthroplasty plus arthroscopic debridement and arthroscopic debridement aloneArthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 1989
- Failure of Extracranial–Intracranial Arterial Bypass to Reduce the Risk of Ischemic StrokeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trialControlled Clinical Trials, 1981