Is There a Preferred Combination Chemotherapy Regimen for Metastastic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?
- 1 June 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Oncologist
- Vol. 7 (3) , 226-233
- https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.7-3-226
Abstract
Learning Objectives: After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Choose the appropriate chemotherapeutic regimen to treat a patient with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Identify the advantages and disadvantages of the various regimens to treat stage IV non-small cell cancer. Understand the toxicities associated with each of the various chemotherapeutic regimens. Access and take the CME test online and receive one hour of AMA PRA category 1 credit at CME.TheOncologist.com Since over 70% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have advanced (locally advanced or metastatic) disease, the majority of NSCLC patients might benefit from chemotherapy. During the past decade, a number of new agents (paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, irinotecan, and topotecan) have been found to be effective against lung cancer. These agents have been combined with cisplatin, carboplatin, and nonplatinum drugs to treat NSCLC. They, in general, produce median survival times of 8-10 months and 1- and 2-year survival rates of 35%-40% and 10%-15%, respectively. Based on this review, there is not a preferred combination chemotherapy regimen to treat advanced NSCLC patients. However, there are a number of different regimens from which to choose.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Four Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Cancer Statistics, 2002CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2002
- Comparison of Survival and Quality of Life in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Two Dose Levels of Paclitaxel Combined With Cisplatin Versus Etoposide With Cisplatin: Results of an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Versus Cisplatin Alone in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- Randomized Phase III Study of Gemcitabine-Cisplatin Versus Etoposide-Cisplatin in the Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 1999
- Randomized trial comparing cisplatin with cisplatin plus vinorelbine in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998