Statistical Evaluation of Prognostic versus Diagnostic Models: Beyond the ROC Curve
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Chemistry
- Vol. 54 (1) , 17-23
- https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2007.096529
Abstract
Background: Diagnostic and prognostic or predictive models serve different purposes. Whereas diagnostic models are usually used for classification, prognostic models incorporate the dimension of time, adding a stochastic element.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Receiver-Operating Characteristic Analysis for Evaluating Diagnostic Tests and Predictive ModelsCirculation, 2007
- Time and chance: the stochastic nature of disease causationThe Lancet, 2005
- Limitations of the Odds Ratio in Gauging the Performance of a Diagnostic, Prognostic, or Screening MarkerAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- The Central Role of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves in Evaluating Tests for the Early Detection of CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2003
- Prognosis - what does the clinician associate with this notion?Statistics in Medicine, 2000
- Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease Using Risk Factor CategoriesCirculation, 1998
- Estimating Diagnostic Test Accuracy Using a "Fuzzy Gold Standard"Medical Decision Making, 1995
- Analyzing a Portion of the ROC CurveMedical Decision Making, 1989
- The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Radiology, 1982
- Risk stratification after acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1978