Effect of Pre-Known Stimulus-Reversals on Apparent Cerebral Dominance in Word Recognition
- 1 December 1963
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 17 (3) , 799-810
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1963.17.3.799
Abstract
In two experiments Os reproduced eight-letter words or nonsense-words tachistoscopically exposed across fixation. For some words the meaningful sequence of letters, or the orientation of the letters, or both, were reversed with respect to the normal left-right arrangement in English. O always knew prior to exposure which stimulus-condition was to appear. Relative errors to the left or right of fixation varied depending upon both stimulus-condition and individual O. The sequence of letters exerted the greater effect. Results are interpreted as suggesting a temporal-spatial perceptual mechanism, analyzing the traces of the visual pattern from left to right, or from right to left, with the direction determined by the responsiveness of O to letter-orientation and letter-sequence. This interpretation is offered as an alternative to a simple notion of cerebral hemispheric dominance.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Stimulus Reversals on Lateral Dominance in Word RecognitionPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1963
- Reversal reading by Israeli observers of visual patterns without intrinsic directionality.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1963
- Preversus post-knowledge of required reproduction sequence for tachistoscopic patterns.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1963
- Monocular and Binocular Reproduction of Binary Stimuli Appearing Right and Left of FixationThe American Journal of Psychology, 1962
- Directional Response-Bias in Reproducing Brief Visual PatternsPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1962
- Tachistoscopic recognition of non-alphabetical material.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1960
- The effects of retinal locus and attention on the perception of words.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959
- Perception as a Function of Retinal Locus and AttentionThe American Journal of Psychology, 1957
- Word recognition as a function of retinal locus.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1952
- Superior Elementary-School Readers Contrasted with Inferior Readers in Letter-Position, “Range of Attention,” ScoresThe Journal of Educational Research, 1939