Explanation of thediscrepancy using new physics
- 1 August 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review D
- Vol. 54 (3) , 2114-2117
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.54.2114
Abstract
The experimental values of and are the only data which do not seem to agree with standard model predictions. Although it is still premature to draw any definite conclusions, it is timely to look for new physics which could explain the excess in and deficit in . We investigate this problem in a simple extension of the standard model, where a charge isosinglet quark is added to the standard spectrum. Upon the further introduction of an extra scalar doublet, one finds a solution with interesting consequences.
Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Precision tests of the MSSMPhysics Letters B, 1996
- Z→bb¯excess and top quark decayPhysical Review D, 1996
- -D¯mixing in the presence of isosinglet quarksPhysical Review D, 1995
- Quark singlets: Implications and constraintsPhysical Review D, 1995
- The quantum correlation Rb−Rc in the MSSM: more hints of supersymmetry?Physics Letters B, 1995
- Singlet charge 2/3 quark hiding the top quark: Fermilab Tevatron and CERN LEP implicationsPhysical Review D, 1995
- Implications of Γ(Z → bb̄) for supersymmetry searches and model-buildingPhysics Letters B, 1994
- Oblique corrections from vectorlike singlet and doublet quarksPhysical Review D, 1993
- Evading the top-quark mass bound at the Fermilab Tevatron: New signals for the top quarkPhysical Review Letters, 1991
- An exotic top quarkNuclear Physics B, 1989