Elimination of the influence of intravesical pressure on the micturitional urethral pressure profile by calculation of urethral cross-sectional area: an experimental study
- 1 March 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 73 (3) , 279-283
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb07519.x
Abstract
To determine whether it is possible to eliminate the influence of intravesical pressure on the pressure drop recorded between the bladder and prostatic urethra during the micturitional urethral pressure profile (MUPP). An experimental study using an artificial bladder/urethral model and computerized urethral pressure profile measurement system. By simultaneous measurement of the flow rate and MUPP it is possible to calculate a theoretical cross-sectional area, based on Griffiths' theory of flow through distensible tubes. The calculated cross-sectional area for a given constriction remains the same despite changes in the driving pressure. The effect of changes in intravesical pressure on the MUPP can be eliminated by calculation of the urethral cross-sectional area. This parameter forms part of the Schäfer model of obstruction and this technique may therefore be useful in quantifying bladder outlet obstruction.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Adaptation of Urethral Pressure Profiles to Detect Sphincter Incompetence and Sphincter Obstruction using a MicrocomputerJournal of Urology, 1987
- Urethral resistance? Urodynamic concepts of physiological and pathological bladder outlet function during voidingNeurourology and Urodynamics, 1985
- The Urethral Pressure Profile During FlowScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1984
- The Contribution of the Bladder Outlet to the Relation Between Pressure and Flow Rate During MicturitionPublished by Springer Nature ,1983
- Micturitional Static Urethral Pressure Profile: A Method of Recording Urethral Pressure Profile During Voiding and the ImplicationsJournal of Urology, 1980
- THE URETHRAL PRESSURE PROFILEBritish Journal of Urology, 1969