Computerized data collection in the operating room during coronary artery bypass surgery: A comparison to the hand-written anesthesia record
Open Access
- 1 August 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
- Vol. 11 (5) , 545-551
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1053-0770(97)90001-x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- National Heart and Lung Institute (HL44719)
- National Institutes of Health
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improvement of outcomes after coronary artery bypass: A randomized trial comparing intraoperative high versus low mean arterial pressureThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1995
- Computerized patient anesthesia records: less time and better quality than manually produced anesthesia recordsJournal of Clinical Anesthesia, 1993
- Are automated anesthesia records better?Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 1992
- Automating the recording and improving the presentation of the anesthesia recordJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 1989
- Differences Between Handwritten and Automatic Blood Pressure RecordsAnesthesiology, 1989
- Automated charting of physiological variables in anesthesia: A quantitative comparison of automated versus handwritten anesthesia recordsJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 1988
- An anesthesia information system for monitoring and record keeping during surgical anesthesiaJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 1986
- MICROCOMPUTER-BASED ANAESTHETIC RECORD SYSTEMBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1984
- A Computerized Anesthesia-Operating Room Information SystemJournal of Clinical Engineering, 1984
- A new anaesthetic recordAnaesthesia, 1982